送交者: asker 于 2011-09-12, 09:21:24:

回答: This statement is so wrong. 由 LaoXiao 于 2011-09-12, 09:03:30:

• I was thinking about Voltaire. Obviously your opinion - LaoXiao (43 bytes) 2011-09-12, 11:29:31 (619322)
  • He was certainly a great thinker in the elightment movement and social reform, - asker (133 bytes) 2011-09-12, 12:01:45 (619343)
• 庞加莱、巴斯德 (无内容) - pulsetube (0 bytes) 2011-09-12, 09:41:26 (619283)
  • 庞加莱拣了些黎曼/高斯的零碎，巴斯德原创不如Bassi等人，重要性不如Koch等人 (无内容) - asker (0 bytes) 2011-09-12, 09:57:18 (619288)
• 笛卡尔 (无内容) - five (0 bytes) 2011-09-12, 09:40:21 (619280)
  • he contributed bits to sci n phil, but neither ground-breaking, nor systematic (无内容) - asker (0 bytes) 2011-09-12, 09:50:17 (619284)
    • 相当地groundbreaking啊 (无内容) - five (0 bytes) 2011-09-12, 09:55:56 (619286)
      • Descartes is a dwarf compared to Leibnize, Newton, or Euler (无内容) - asker (0 bytes) 2011-09-12, 10:02:31 (619291)
        • 我思故我在. 狗眼看人低. (无内容) - 093 (0 bytes) 2011-09-12, 10:13:38 (619297)
          • 不是看人低，是比其它几个巨人低一点点而已 (无内容) - 008 (0 bytes) 2011-09-12, 10:18:48 (619300)
          • 讨论问题嘛,何必骂人呢。 (无内容) - five (0 bytes) 2011-09-12, 10:16:58 (619299)
            • 理他做甚？他就是那个成天喊劳改黑五类的脑残毛粪，到这里找被砍被抽的变态快感 (无内容) - asker (0 bytes) 2011-09-12, 10:44:30 (619306)

加跟贴